ESA Weekly News Report, Dec 12th: Texas Supreme Court Might Re-Evaluate Service Animal Rights

  • Home
  • /
  • ESA Weekly News Report, Dec 12th: Texas Supreme Court Might Re-Evaluate Service Animal Rights

By: Erika Updated: December 12, 2024

Service dog, therapy dog. A dog on a leash sitting next to its owner in a restaurant.
This may be the season to be jolly, but you can be sure the CertaPet team will continue our efforts to keep readers informed of the latest happenings in the Service and Emotional Support Animal community. For instance, this week, we have the scoop on a critical case taken up by the Texas Supreme Court. Read on to find out more!

Service Dog Attack Sparks Debate Over Therapy Animal Certifications and Physician Responsibility

The Supreme Court of Texas is currently reviewing a pivotal case that could alter legal responsibilities surrounding Service Animals and their certification.

The case, titled Maurice N. Leibman, M.D. v. Cleveratta Waldroup and James Waldroup, Individually and As Next Friends of R.W., a Minor (No. 23-0317), seeks to explore the role of a gynecologist’s letter in a tragic incident where a Service Animal (identified as a Pit Bull) attacked a child at a restaurant, causing severe injuries.

The controversy began when the dog, which was wearing a vest labeled “Service Dog,” allegedly attacked a young child in a public dining setting in Spring, Texas. 

Initially, the victim’s family filed a lawsuit against the dog’s owner, identified as Jennifer Romano in the suit. However, they also sought legal action against the physician who provided the letter supporting the dog as a Therapy Animal, accusing the doctor of negligence and aiding and abetting.

According to the case details, the letter provided by Romano’s gynecologist was critical in helping her avoid eviction. The letter described Kingston (Romano’s Service Animal) as ‘necessary’ for managing her generalized anxiety disorder.

The legal saga of the case took a significant turn on September 27, 2024, when the Texas Supreme Court agreed to review it. This came after the Houston Court of Appeals ruled that the claims against the doctor did not fall under the category of healthcare liability.

The appellate court opined that the letter specifically addressed housing concerns rather than providing medical care. The court further clarified that the letter did not violate identifiable safety or medical standards outlined in Chapter 74 of the Medical Liability Act.

The case taken up by the Texas Supreme Court is ringing alarm bells among experts and activists alike because if the state’s highest court rules in favor of the child’s family, it could have far-reaching consequences.

Medical professionals may become more reluctant to approve Emotional Support or Service Animals, fearing potential legal repercussions. The case also draws attention to the larger issue of insufficient regulation for Service Animals.

While Texas law defines Service Animals as those trained to perform specific tasks for individuals with disabilities, Emotional Support Animals do not meet this standard, and right now, there is no standardized certification process at either the federal or state level.

The outcome of this case could influence the future designation of Service Animals and the legal risks associated with medical recommendations in Texas, potentially changing the relationship between healthcare providers and their patients in this area.

Source: IrvingJournal and CoA

CertaPet’s Thoughts on This Week’s News

The incident which took place in Spring, Texas deepens the overall discussion concerning service animals and therapy animals. What happened during this unfortunate event, should lead us to take the matter of qualifying an animal either as a service animal or as an emotional support animal much more seriously. Abusing current laws that are put in place to safeguard service animal owners and others could result in the stripping away of such privileges if they are not respected.

A further question to ask is whether healthcare providers not specialized in mental health care should be allowed to recommend Therapy Animals. What do you think is the right approach in such cases? Be sure to let us know your thoughts in the comment section. 

If you’re living with a mental illness, getting a Psychiatric Service Dog could really help your recovery. These loving animals could ease your symptoms and help you live a happier, fuller life. If you’re ready to start the process, take our 5-minute pre-screening test for free. We’ll connect you with a licensed mental health professional, who will have a consultation with you. Then, if you qualify, you’ll get your Psychiatric Service Dog travel letter in no time.


You may also like

December 20, 2024

  This week’s news from the CertaPet team and the Emotional Support Animal world ...

Read More

Page [tcb_pagination_current_page] of [tcb_pagination_total_pages]

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

All product and Company names are Trademarks™ or Registered® trademarks of their respective holders.

Disclosure: Bear in mind that some of the links in this post are affiliate links and if you go through them to make a purchase CertaPet.com may earn a commission. Keep in mind that we link these companies and their products because of their quality and not because of the commission we receive from your purchases. The decision is yours, and whether or not you decide to buy something is completely up to you.

>